The Importance of Spending Time Away from The Digital World

I touched on the Cal Newport’s book Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World last week in a post on willpower, and felt his important work warrants a deeper overview, so much in fact that I’m going to divide it into multiple articles. Newport is a professor of computer science at Georgetown University and the author of a number of important books including Deep Work, So Good They Can’t Ignore You and How to Become a Straight-A Student .

Newport’s thesis on digital minimalism:

Our current relationship with the technologies of our hyper-connected world is unsustainable and is leading us closer to the quiet desperation that Thoreau observed so many years ago. But as Thoreau reminds us, ‘the sun rose clear’ and we still have the ability to change this state of affairs. To do so, however, we cannot passively allow the wild tangle of tools, entertainments, and distractions provided by the internet age to dictate how we spend our time or how we feel. We must indeed take steps to extract the good from these technologies while sidestepping what’s bad. We require a philosophy that puts our aspirations and values once again in charge of our daily experience, all the while dethroning primal whims and the business models of Silicon Valley from their current dominance of this role; a philosophy that accepts new technologies, but not if the price is the dehumanization Andrew Sullivan warned us about; a philosophy that prioritizes long-term meaning over short-term satisfaction. A philosophy, in other words, like digital minimalism.

The era of the smartphone is incredibly fascinating. For all the positives these devices have brought to society, so many of us struggle with the nagging feeling that for all the good they provide, there’s a downside. Newport’s use of the famous Henry David Thoreau term, “quiet desperation”, is very fitting. Smartphones and social media apps, with the promise of optimizing our life and making us more connected often have the opposite effect.

Read More